Legal Opinion
Shands v. Tull
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 24, 1979No. 78-2247PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
In this case we must consider the role of the federal courts in enforcing federal regulations governing state welfare programs that receive federal subsidies. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey enjoined the State of New Jersey (“New Jersey” or the “State”) from violating a federal regulation that requires the State to take final administrative action within ninety days on any appeal from the denial of a claim under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program. The district court ordered that in any cases in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jane Fortin, Etc. v. Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Barnes v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Albiston v. Maine Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Joseph Wilkinson v. Maurice AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Edward Withrow Janelle Roberts v. Kevin Concannon Freddye Webb-PetettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.