State v. Bello
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendant was convicted of betting on horse races on December 27, 1945, January 4, 1946, and January 5, 1946, contrary to the provisions of General Statutes § 6280. He appealed on the ground that the trial court erred in refusing to correct the finding, in a ruling on evidence and in its construction of the statute.
The finding may be summarized as follows: The defendant has conducted a stationery and tobacco store in Stamford for some years. On the dates mentioned an officer in plain clothes made bets with the defendant on horse races and on the first occasion saw the defendant write…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. FaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- State v. SchleiferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rawson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
- Santangelo v. Middlesex Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ParadiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Heaton v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WoolcockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Citerella v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.