Legal Opinion
State v. Schleifer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The information upon which the accused was upon trial was before us upon a motion to quash. 99 Conn. 432, 121 Atl. 805. It charges the common-law crime of solicitation. The State offered evidence to prove that there existed on November 22d, 1922, a strike of the shopmen on the New Haven railroad and that at a meeting of the strikers in New Haven on this day the accused addressed them in substance as follows:
“You will never win the strike with soft methods. You young men ought to go out on the bridge. Don’t use eggs, use coal or indelible ink. Break foremen’s windows at their homes. Watch the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Debs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Shailer v. BullockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.