Legal Opinion
Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 2002No. A086991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
113 Cal.Rptr.2d 494 (2002)
93 Cal.App.4th 824
Patricia HENLEY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
PHILIP MORRIS INC., Defendant and Appellant.
No. A086991.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four.
November 7, 2001.
Review Granted January 29, 2002.
Gerald V. Barron, Lucy E. Mason, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., San Francisco, M. Laurence Popofsky, Curtis M. Caton, David B. Goodwin, San Francisco, Wayne Stephen Braveman, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Los Angeles, for Appellant.
Daniel Upham Smith, Los Angeles, Ted W. Pelletier, Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith, Harry F. Wartnick, Madelyn Joyce Chaber,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003