Legal Opinion

Newman v. S. A. Brown & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. Action brought by 8. A. Brown and G. B. Shaw, partners as S. A. Brown & Co., against Newman and another, to recover $222.18 with interest, and to foreclose an alleged mechanics’ lien upon certain lots in the city of Emporia. Trial at the March Term, 1881, when the court sustained the lien for a part of the amount claimed, and entered a decree of foreclosure. Defendant Newman brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action in which S. A. Brown & Co. attempted to foreclose a mechanics’ lien against F. C. Newman, the plaintiff in error. The district court sustained the lien for a part of the amount claimed, and entered a decree of foreclosure; to reverse which, this proceeding in error has been brought. The testimony has not been preserved, and the case stands before us upon the pleadings, findings, and judg*118ment. From them these facts appear: On the 7th of October, 1879, Newman, being the owner of certain lots in the city of Emporia, made a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Whitfield v. Frensley Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Reeves v. Kansas Cooperative Wheat Marketing Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Standard Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Sprague Investment Co. v. Mouat Lumber & Investment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API