Parker v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
from District Court, Texas County; R. H. Loofbourrow, Judge. Action by C. A. .Walker and others against L. W. Parker. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
Read the full summary
from District Court, Texas County; R. H. Loofbourrow, Judge. Action by C. A. .Walker and others against L. W. Parker. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. It appears that the plaintiffs below were dealers in building material, and on March 24, 1908, entered into a ■ contract with G. W. McCon to furnish material for two buildings and a barn on lots 1, 2, 3, 11, and 12 in block 6 in the town of Hooker, Okla., and the evidence fairly shows that it was an entire contract to furnish the material for the three buildings. The lien claim filed, and to enforce which this action is…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DEVEREUX, C.
(after stating the facts as above). Two principal assignments of error are urged in this court: First,-that the lien is void and not enforceable, because the material was used in the construction of two buildings, the sizes of same being unknown to the plaintiff, one being located on lots 11 and 12, block 6, the other on lots 1, 2, and 3, in the same block, also a barn on the last-named lots, and that said lots are .not contiguous, although located on the same block; and, second, that the verification to the lien statement is not sufficient. Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 3862,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sergeant v. DenbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Phillips v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Doolittle v. PlenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- El Reno Electric Light and Telephone Co. v. JennisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roy F. Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Sherbondy v. Tulsa Boiler & MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Buerger Investment Co. v. B. F. Salzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- In Re RhineDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.