Legal Opinion
Caremore, Inc./Wooddale Nursing Home v. Hollis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 22, 2007No. A06A1778PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Charlotte Hollis, who sustained a work-related injury, brought a workers’ compensation claim against Caremore, Incorporated/Wooddale Nursing Home and Royal & SunAlliance (collectively, “Caremore”).1 Following a hearing on stipulated facts, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation (the “Board”) assessed penalties against Caremore for violating Board rules and increased Hollis’s income benefits. After the superior court affirmed this ruling, we granted Caremore’s application for discretionary appeal. On appeal, Caremore asserts that: (1) the Board erred in imposing penalties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holt Service Co. v. ModlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Smith v. ByessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- State v. GraulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Dallas v. Flying J, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Groth v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aimwell, Inc. v. McLendon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Mulligan v. SELECTIVE HR SOLUTIONS, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Selective HR Solutions, Inc. v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- McLendon Enterprises, Inc. v. Aimwell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012