Legal Opinion

Groth v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 2005No. A05A1496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Paul Groth and Christopher Welton appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Ace Cash Express, Inc. (“Ace”) on Ace’s claim that they were personally liable to Ace as guarantors of the debts of Empire Financial, LLP (“Empire”). Groth and Welton argue that the trial court instead should have granted their motion for summary judgment because the guaranty Ace seeks to enforce does not satisfy the Statute of Frauds. We agree and reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pirkle v. Robson Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Upshaw v. Southern Wholesale Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Winburn v. McGuire Investment Group, 17Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Hartkopf v. Heinrich Ad. BerkemannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Gigandet v. Lighting Galleries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Georgia Women's Health Center, LLC v. Katherine B. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Elwell v. KeefeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Caremore, Inc./Wooddale Nursing Home v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Patel v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API