Legal Opinion
Tallacus v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2011No. 10-311CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This matter comes befoi’e the Court on defendant the United States’ motion to dismiss Count I of plaintiff Larry D. Tallaeus’ amended complaint. Because the Court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs breach of contract claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.504, defendant’s motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1997, plaintiff brought a Title VII employment discrimination action against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the “Department”) based its “failure to promote [plaintiff] or increase his [pay] grade.” (Amend. Compl. ¶…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Nez Perce Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Brandt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Goodeagle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Larry D. Tallacus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013