Legal Opinion

Goodeagle v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 12, 2012No. 11-582 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

On September 9, 2011, plaintiffs, enrolled members of the federally recognized Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma (“Quapaw Tribe” or “Tribe”) and owners of allotments of land managed by defendant, the United States, filed this putative class action alleging that *167defendant breached fiduciary duties and trust obligations owed to plaintiffs. See Compl. (docket entry 1). Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Defendant’s motion relies upon…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Ministerio Roca Solida v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API