Legal Opinion

Loop v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1966No. Civ. 22492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Plaintiffs purported to appeal from an order of the trial court which sustained the demurrer of the defendant State of California without leave to amend. By stipulation and order for augmentation and correction of the record on appeal, there was brought before this court the judgment of dismissal which was signed and entered following the making and entry of the order first mentioned. The appeal therefore may be and now is considered as from the latter judgment. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2(c); Vibert v. Berger (1966) 64 Cal.2d 65, 68-69 [48 Cal.Rptr. 886, 410 P.2d 390]; Evola v. Wendt…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Cabell v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Greenfield v. Insurance Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Cabell v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API