Legal Opinion

Kelaco v. Davis & McKean General Partnership

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, J.:

¶ 1 Kelaco appeals the trial court’s determination that an easement agreement pertaining to land owned by Davis & McKean General Partnership (“Davis”) did not violate certain agreements binding Appellant and Davis. We affirm.

¶ 2 Appellant instituted this action against Davis and Food Lion, Inc. (collectively, Appellees) after Davis and Food Lion entered into an agreement wherein Food Lion and Davis created a mutual easement over a portion of land straddling the common boundary line of property owned by them. Appellant sought to have the easement agreement declared invalid and an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Siciliano v. MislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Patricca v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Litwack v. LitwackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Cole v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Booher v. OlczakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Solomon v. United States Healthcare Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Kelly v. Hazleton General HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Delaney v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API