Kelaco v. Davis & McKean General Partnership
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, J.:
¶ 1 Kelaco appeals the trial court’s determination that an easement agreement pertaining to land owned by Davis & McKean General Partnership (“Davis”) did not violate certain agreements binding Appellant and Davis. We affirm.
¶ 2 Appellant instituted this action against Davis and Food Lion, Inc. (collectively, Appellees) after Davis and Food Lion entered into an agreement wherein Food Lion and Davis created a mutual easement over a portion of land straddling the common boundary line of property owned by them. Appellant sought to have the easement agreement declared invalid and an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Siciliano v. MislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Patricca v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Litwack v. LitwackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cole v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Booher v. OlczakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Solomon v. United States Healthcare Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Kelly v. Hazleton General HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Delaney v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.