Legal Opinion

Delaney v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting judgment in favor of Appellees Archdiocese of Philadelphia, Cardinal Justin Rigali, and Cardinal Anthony Bevilac-qua on the basis that the claims of Appellant John Delaney were barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

Entry of judgment on the pleadings is permitted under [Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1034] which provides for such judgment after the pleadings are closed, but within which such time as not to delay trial. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is similar to a demurrer. It may be entered where…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. MarcantonioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Kelaco v. Davis & McKean General PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheldon Stephens v. Kevin ClashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Bariski v. Reassure America Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Ippolito v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2014
  4. Sheldon Stephens v. Kevin ClashCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API