Legal Opinion
Howard v. Leonardo
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1994No. 5:89-cr-00110PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff brought the instant civil rights action claiming that he was confined to Involuntary Protective Custody (“IPC”) in retaliation for the exercise of his constitutional rights, and was denied his right of access to the courts when his typewriter was confiscated for a period of sixteen days. Specifically, he alleges that he was confined to IPC in retaliation for drafting and distributing forms to the inmate population for filing grievances pursuant to N.Y. Correction Law § 114-a (“§ 114-a Forms”), and that as a result of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Tafari v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Vega v. ArtusDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Banks v. AnnucciDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Goodell v. AnthonyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.