Legal Opinion

Britton v. Hoyt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1974No. 160PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The basic issue on this appeal is whether the trial court should have changed the apportionment of causal negligence found by the jury; and if so, whether the apportionment made is sustained by the evidence.

The facts out of which this issue arises are somewhat in dispute. Britton and Lund spent part of the evening of July 29, 1968, at a dance hall called “Out of Sight” in *691Menomonie. They danced and drank beer until closing, about 1 o’clock in the morning, and then proceeded toward Britton’s home. After driving approximately two or two and a half miles on a county road, Britton was going west…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tesch v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rodenbeck v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bohlman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Grover P. MacOn v. Seaward Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. Laws v. WebbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Gross v. Midwest Speedways, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. DeGroff v. SchmudeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API