Legal Opinion

Rodenbeck v. American Mutual Liability Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1971No. 228PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Three issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Is there any credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict?

2. Was defense counsel’s closing argument so prejudicial to plaintiff as to require a new trial?

3. Should this court invoke its power under sec. 251.09, Stats., and reverse the order as a matter of discretion?

Credible evidence.

Appellants contend that the jury verdict was not supported by the evidence. On review here when a jury verdict is challenged we have repeatedly stated the rule to be:

“[W]e must judge the jury verdict in the light of the familiar rules that (1) a jury verdict will not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Chapnitsky v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Metcalf v. Consolidated Badger Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cornwell v. RohrerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coryell v. ConnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Roehl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Howard v. DuerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API