Rodenbeck v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are raised on this appeal:
1. Is there any credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict?
2. Was defense counsel’s closing argument so prejudicial to plaintiff as to require a new trial?
3. Should this court invoke its power under sec. 251.09, Stats., and reverse the order as a matter of discretion?
Credible evidence.
Appellants contend that the jury verdict was not supported by the evidence. On review here when a jury verdict is challenged we have repeatedly stated the rule to be:
“[W]e must judge the jury verdict in the light of the familiar rules that (1) a jury verdict will not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Chapnitsky v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Metcalf v. Consolidated Badger Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Cornwell v. RohrerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coryell v. ConnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Roehl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Howard v. DuerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.