Legal Opinion

Ka'u Agribusiness Co. v. Heirs of Ahulau

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2004No. 24420PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit1 (the court) did not err in granting the March 23, 2001 summary judgment motion of Plaintiff-Appellee Ka‘u Agribusiness Co., Inc. (Plaintiff) because (1) the unnamed heirs of Moi Hilinai were not indispensable to this litigation and (2) under the facts of this case, Revised Laws of Hawaii (RLH) § 4815 (1935), which precluded inheritance of patrilineal intestate property by illegitimate issue, will not be retroactively invalidated, inasmuch as (a) Plaintiff and its predecessor in title were innocent purchasers…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Omerod v. Heirs of KaheananuiHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hart v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. The Bank of New York Mellon v. R. Onaga, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. v. SilvaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. MAUNA KEA AGRIBUSINESS CO., INC. v. NaukaHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API