Legal Opinion

United States v. William F. Ray

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1973No. 73-1430PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from his conviction of a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., and the regulations enacted thereunder. Specifically, he appeals from his conviction for failure to tag nine game birds as required by 50 C.F.R. § 10.36. The matter was tried before a United States Magistrate sitting without a jury and the conviction was affirmed on appeal to the district court.

The facts are not in dispute: Appellant and two hunting companions embarked upon a duck hunting trip in and around the Skip Out Lake area in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma on December 9, 1972.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. W. Darrell Zang and Louis PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Bryceson PintoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States of America, Appellee-Plaintiff v. Lorenzo Hubbard, Appellant-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API