Legal Opinion

McCray v. Miller &8212 Bland v. Bland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1919No. 10291PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. Action by W. S. McCray against Ambrose Miller and others. From the judgment McCray and Owen W. Bland bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This is an equitable action for the cancellation of an oil and gas lease. At the request of all parties the trial court made separate findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are as follows:

“Findings of Fact by the Court.
“In this case the court finds the facts to be:
“1. That the land involved in this suit and covered by the oil and gas lease in controversy, is as described in the pleadings and consists of 160 acres of the allotment of one Owen W. Bland, who was a member of the Creek tribe of Indians by blood.,
“2. The court finds that the said Owen W. Bland and the. defendant Fern Bland…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Franklin v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Houston & Great Northern R. R. v. WinterTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Johnson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Kerns v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Jackson v. Twin State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. In Re WinelandDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API