Legal Opinion

State v. Salter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2008No. 20080080PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Patrick Salter appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of an intoxicating liquor in violation of N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01, entered upon a conditional plea of guilty after the district court denied his motion to suppress. Salter argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he did not voluntarily consent to blood-alcohol testing. We affirm, concluding Salter’s consent was implied and he did not affirmatively withdraw his consent.

I

[¶ 2] On October 14, 2007, North Dakota Highway Patrol Trooper Derek Arndt stopped Salter’s vehicle.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Asbridge v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Brewer v. ZieglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Devils Lake v. GroveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. City of Fargo v. WonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. MorinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. NickelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API