Legal Opinion
Federal Express Corporation v. United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1998No. 97-5793PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant United States Postal Service (“the Postal Service” or “USPS”), on interlocutory appeal certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), has attacked the district court’s rejection of its motion to dis-
miss, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the complaint of plaintiff-appellee Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), which alleged that the Postal Service had disseminated false and deceptive commercial advertisements, to the damage of FedEx, in transgression of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.. USPS has supported its motion with two…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roslyn Currier v. First Resolution Inv. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Dawn Rannals v. Diamond Jo CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Davric Maine Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Flamingo Industries (Usa) Ltd. And Arthur Wah v. United States Postal Service, an Entity Created Pursuant to the Postal Reorganization ActCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Folley v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.