Legal Opinion
Folley v. Henderson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 4, 2001No. C-3-96-446PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION TO DISMISS/MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #37) FILED BY DEFENDANTS TOM NEAL, RONALD DALE AND POSTMASTER GENERAL WILLIAM J. HENDERSON; PLAINTIFF GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM DATE; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBSTITUTE UNITED STATES AS DEFENDANT (DOC. # 42) FILED BY DEFENDANTS TOM NEAL AND RONALD DALE OVERRULED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, IF AND WHEN PLAINTIFF FILES AMENDED COMPLAINT; THIS DECISION AND ENTRY IS NOT A FINAL, AP-PEALABLE ORDER
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation stems from the termination of Plaintiff Mi’chal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Good v. Ohio Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- William F. Glarner v. United States of America, Department of Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryan v. McDonaldDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Dasilva, Jr. v. EsperDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Dasilva, Jr. v. EsperDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Seifu v. Postmaster General, US Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Sharp v. Worthington City School Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.