Legal Opinion

Flamingo Industries (Usa) Ltd. And Arthur Wah v. United States Postal Service, an Entity Created Pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2002No. 01-15963PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Flamingo Industries and its owner Arthur Wah (collectively “Flamingo”) brought suit in the Northern District of California against the United States Postal Service. Flamingo asserted a number of federal and state law claims stemming from the Postal Service’s termination of Flamingo’s contract to produce U.S. Mail sacks. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue, and did not reach the merits of any of the claims. Flamingo appeals.

According to the allegations of Flamingo’s complaint, which we take as true for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Tritz v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Whitehorn v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002
  4. United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (Usa) Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States Postal Service v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API