Legal Opinion

State v. . Norris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

The first exception and assignment of error of defendant is as follows: “For that the court refused to direct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty.” This exception and assignment of error cannot be sustained. O. S., 4643, is as follows: “When on the trial of any criminal action in the Superior Court, or in any criminal court, the State has produced its evidence and rested its case, the defendant may move to dismiss the action or for judgment of nonsuit. If the motion is allowed, judgment shall be entered accordingly; and such judgment shall have the force and effect of a verdict of 'not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. State v. . FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Beam v. . GilkeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API