Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 2005No. 437A04PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The sole issue before the Court is whether the State presented sufficient evidence that defendant, Franklin Lee McNeil, possessed 5.5 grams of crack cocaine, such that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motions to dismiss the charge of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine. We determine that the evidence presented by the State during defendant’s trial, considered as a whole and taken in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient for the trial court to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals.

PROCED…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. AbshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. MalachiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. NaborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API