Legal Opinion

State v. Epps

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

At the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant in the court below made motions for judg*713ment as in case of nonsuit. N. C. Code, 1935 (Micbie), section 4643. Tbe court below refused these motions and in this we can see no error.

The evidence, as before set forth, was plenary to be submitted to the jury on the bill of indictment containing two counts. The defendant was convicted on both counts.

“In S. v. Toole, 106 N. C., 736, it is said: 'There having been a general verdict of guilty on two counts, for offenses punishable alike, it is immaterial to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Anello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API