Legal Opinion

Beam v. . Gilkey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We have here motions in the cause to vacate order of sale and judgment of confirmation entered in a proceeding brought to sell land discharged of contingent interests. Ex Parte Dodd, 62 N. C., 97; McIntosh on Procedure, 1071. The life tenant, her children as remaindermen, and a grandchild were made parties to the proceeding.

The complaint contains allegation of a present vested interest in the property, but none of any contingent interest which is sought to be discharged by a sale. However, looking at the will of G. W. Seagle, to which reference is made in the complaint, it appears that the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Irvin v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. American Trust Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Pendleton v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Edwards v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API