Legal Opinion

People v. Coleman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1969No. Crim. 12369; Crim. 13437PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

A jury found defendant guilty of the first degree murder of Vincent Sulezieh and fixed the penalty at death. The trial court denied a motion for. a new trial or to reduce the penalty to life imprisonment and entered judgment on the verdict. This appeal is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) We also have before us a petition for habeas corpus challenging the judgment.

Vincent Sulezieh operated a cocktail bar in Newark, California. He borrowed money every week from a bank to cash paychecks of his customers, and it was “common gossip” that he carried large amounts of money on his person.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. GhentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API