Spence v. Bacal
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Anthony Spence appeals from the superior court's denial of relief in his special action challenging the Pima County Justice Court's order denying his request for a jury trial on three misdemeanor assault charges. Spence argues he is entitled to a jury trial because, if convicted of all three charges, the aggregate sentence could potentially exceed six months. Because we conclude that misdemeanor assault is not a jury-eligible offense, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 The relevant facts are not in dispute. Spence was charged in justice court with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.