Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. William E. Dixon, P.A.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 1977No. [No. 132, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The case before us involves the enforceability of a real estate contract which is challenged on grounds that title to the property is tainted by a prior fraudulent conveyance, and that the seller, a professional service corporation, possesses no power to convey the land. Concluding that the buyer’s refusal to comply with the agreement was legally unwarranted, we shall affirm the judgment of the chancellor which granted specific performance to the seller.

The disputed contract was executed in the summer of 1975; however, in view of the aforementioned contentions, we must relate several earlier…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berger v. Hi-Gear Tire & Auto Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Berlin v. CaplanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Webb v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Beccio v. Tawnmoore Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Styers v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Kane v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. State v. LohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API