Walent v. Commission on Professional Competence of the Los Angeles Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
—Appellant Los Angeles Unified School District appeals an award of attorney’s fees to Respondent Nancie Walent, after her successful challenge of her dismissal from employment. Although Appellant asserts the trial court erred in its determination of reasonable attorney’s fees, we find neither legal error nor an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determination. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) sought to dismiss Nancie Walent from her employment in 2012. She sought and received a hearing before the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roe v. Halbig, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Glaviano v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Glaviano v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Law Office of Carlos R. Perez v. Whittier Union High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Lonky v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.