Legal Opinion

Bayer-Bel v. Litovsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 2008No. B197829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL, J.

This is a tort action in which three defendants caused an automobile accident, one by negligently driving the car, the other two by negligently entrusting the car to the unlicensed driver. A jury found all three liable to plaintiff and allocated fault among the three defendants, and the trial court, in entering judgment on the verdict, made the driver jointly and severally liable for the entire judgment (noneconomic as well as economic damages), finding that Proposition 51 did not apply. The driver appeals, contending her liability for plaintiff’s noneconomic damages should be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Espinoza v. MacHongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Miller v. StoufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Srithong v. Total Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diaz v. CarcamoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. McKenna v. BeesleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API