Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. MacHonga

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1992No. F016135PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, J.

Richard Espinoza sued Albert Kantor, Larry Machonga and the Housing Authority of Fresno County (hereinafter Housing Authority) for personal injuries after the glass portion of a door shattered and glass fragments struck Espinoza’s eye. The Housing Authority settled with Espinoza for $5,000. The superior court found the settlement to have been made in good faith. The case then went to judicial arbitration.

Espinoza, Kantor, Machonga and the Housing Authority all participated in the arbitration. The parties stipulated that Kantor had no liability in the case. The arbitrator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Arbuthnot v. Relocation Realty Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Dickens v. Ming LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Pierson v. HondaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. C. B. v. City of SonoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. McComber v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API