Legal Opinion
Hardin v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2001No. WD 59183PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Chief Judge.
Denny R. Hardin appeals the circuit court’s judgment to dismiss his “Petition for Redress of Grievance.” The state and the Jackson County Drug Enforcement Task Force assert, however, that we should dismiss Hardin’s appeal for his failure to comply with Rule 84.04. We agree and dismiss Hardin’s appeal.
Hardin appears pro se. We hold pro se appellants to the same procedural rules as attorneys, and we do not grant them preferential treatment regarding compliance with those rules. Wilson v. Carnahan, 25 S.W.3d 664, 667 (MoApp.2000). Failure to comply with the rules of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hall v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Myrick v. Eastern Broadcasting, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Murphy v. ShurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Capital One Bank v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Nicholson v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State of Missouri v. Brad J. JuliusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bittick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.