Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Brad J. Julius

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2014No. ED100555PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge

Introduction

Brad Julius (Defendant) appeals from his judgment of conviction of sexual assault. On appeal, Defendant raises seven points, alleging that the trial court unduly restricted pre-trial discovery, committed four separate instructional errors, and erroneously declined to admonish the jury and grant a mistrial after the prosecutor misstated the law during closing argument. Defendant additionally claims that these errors had a prejudicial cumulative effect. We affirm.

Factual Background

In April 2011, Victim went on a date with a former boyfriend (friend), where they shared a bottle of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koon v. WaldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROBERT EDWARD SMITHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. AyansuMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Christopher Michael King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API