Legal Opinion
Rickenbach v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 22, 2009No. Civil 08-2687 (JBS/KMW)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on two motions to dismiss, one brought by the defendants Wells Fargo, N.A. (“Defendant Wells”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“Defendant MERS”) [Docket Item 20], and the other by the defendant law firm Zucker, Goldberg, and Ackerman (“Defendant Zucker”) [Docket Item 21], Together, Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiffs’ myriad claims under New Jersey law arising out of allegedly excessive and illegal mortgage processing fees. This opinion will address the voluntary payment rule, the limited…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Dehart v. US Bank, N.A. NDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Cappalli v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
- Rivera v. Washington Mutual BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.