Legal Opinion
Rivera v. Washington Mutual Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 10, 2009No. Civil Action 09-021 (JEI/JS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
In this case, the Court is presented with a hopelessly muddled, misstated and mangled Amended Complaint, which, in addition to barely pleading sufficient facts, also presents complicated jurisdictional issues. This much seems to be clear: this is a proposed class action suit seeking to recover various fees and costs collected in connection with home foreclosure actions. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants charged and collected “various fees not authorized by the [mortgage] loan documents or applicable law” and “overcharged defaulting borrowers of residential…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skypala v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Ergowerx International, LLC v. Maxell Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Martino v. Everhome MortgageDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Perkins v. Washington Mutual, FSBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.