Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Livingsocial, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0864PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs amended complaint. Upon consideration of the motion, the response and reply thereto, the entire record, and for the reasons explained below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Wendy Murphy is resident of the State of Illinois. Amend. Compl. (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. Defendant LivingSocial, Inc. (“LivingSocial”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Washington, D.C. Compl. ¶ 2. LivingSocial operates a group buying website…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- SASA Investment Holdings, LLC v. ChhatralaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Skt2, LLC v. Rivet Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Wiggins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026