Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Reis
California Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1943No. L. A. 18523PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
21 Cal.2d 654 (1943)
DORRANCE P. HICKS et al., Respondents,
v.
JOHN REIS et al., Defendants; FRED W. GRAY, Appellant.
L. A. No. 18523.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Feb. 26, 1943.
Jennings & Belcher, Frank B. Belcher and Louis E. Kearney for Appellant.
James C. Hollingsworth, Henderson & Churchill and E. Perry Churchill for Respondents.
PETERS, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, recovered judgment against defendants Stanley Reis and John Reis in the sum of $6,487, and against defendant Fred W. Gray in the sum of $5,000, as damages for injuries sustained by them in a collision of their…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017