Legal Opinion
In Re Maas
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 30, 2009No. 09-21053PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONFIRMING CHAPTER 13 PLAN
ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Creditor Toyota Motor Credit Corporation objects to Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan because its 910 car claim 1 in Debtors’ prior Chapter 13 case does not qualify as a 910 car claim in Debtors’ current case. Toyota argues the Court should equitably toll the 910-car-claim period for the 23 months during which Debtors’ first case was pending.
Findings of Fact
Debtors purchased a 2003 Chevrolet Trailblazer encumbered by a lien in favor of Toyota on August 14, 2006. Three hundred two days later on June 12, 2007,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- David Warren v. Henry Garvin, Supt. Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, Robert HanslmaierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Ralph E. Taylor, Debtor. Ralph E. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeNoce v. Neff (In Re Neff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lyon v. Aguilar (In Re Aguilar)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Hingiss v. MMCC Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- In Re HingissUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- In re SpinksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2018