Hingiss v. MMCC Financial Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining the objection of MMCC Financial Corporation to the confirmation of Amy and Joshua Hingiss’s Chapter 13 plan. The issue presented is whether the 910-day period in the “hanging paragraph” of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) is a statute of limitations subject to equitable tolling.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 1, 2007, debtors Amy and Joshua Hingiss purchased a 2004 Dodge Caravan. MMCC Financial Corporation financed the purchase and took a security interest in the vehicle. A security interest created through a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stamat v. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- In Re WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- In the Matter of Martin Szekely and Donna Szekely, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reinbold v. Kohansieh (In re Sandburg Mall Realty Management LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re SpinksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2018
- In re HoskinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018