Legal Opinion
De La Fuente v. South Carolina Democratic Party
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 25, 2016No. CA No. 3:16-cv-00322-CMCPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction
CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE, Senior United States District Judge
On February 2, 2016, Plaintiff Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente (“De La Fuente”) filed a Complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief determining that the decision of the South Carolina Democratic Party not to include him on the list of approved candidates to appear on South Carolina’s Presidential Primary Ballot “is unconstitutional and violative of the 14th *797Amendment to the United States Constitution and violates 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.” Entry No. 1, Compl. ¶ 34. On…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- S.C. Elec. v. RandallDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
- Boon Insurance Agency Inc, The v. LloydDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Brabham Oil Company, Inc. v. Fuel Trader Supply, LLC, Blue Earth Resources, Inc., Fuel Trader Resource Management, Inc., William R. Eaton, Scott M. Boruff, Charles B Lobetti, III, Gary W. Ford, Jr.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Carelock v. BooneDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Edward D Jones & Co LP v. BarnesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.