Legal Opinion
S.C. Elec. v. Randall
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided August 6, 2018No. Civil Action No.: 3:18-cv-01795-JMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge
Plaintiff South Carolina Electric & Gas Company ("SCE & G") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging constitutional claims against the following Defendants in their official capacities as Commissioners of the South Carolina Public Service Commission ("PSC"): Swain E. Whitfield, Comer H. Randall, John E. Howard, Elliot F. Elam, Jr., Thomas J. Ervin, and G. O'Neal Hamilton (collectively, "Defendants"). (ECF No. 68.) Specifically, SCE & G alleges that its rights *558under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carelock v. BooneDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Glytec LLC v. Prisma HealthDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Prysmian Cables & Systems USA LLC v. SzymanskiDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Shawn Phillip Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021