PAGET ET UX v. City of Pendleton
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendant city of Pendleton from foreclosing a water line extension lien arising out of an assessment made by the defendant against property in the Montee Addition to the city of Pendleton.
In 1955 Mr. William F. Brenner, a contractor and builder, was in the process of developing the Montee Addition which had just been platted, and which consisted of 127 lots. He requested the Pendleton city council to cooperate with him in working out an arrangement by which the Addition could be furnished with water through an extension of the defendant’s water system. As a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- City of McMinnville v. HowenstineOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- City Commission of Jackson v. HirschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Beaverton v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Bechtell v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Paul Scotton Con. Co., Inc. v. Mayor & Coun. of DoverCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
- Bechtell v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1961