Bechtell v. City of Salem
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
Defendant city appeals from a decree which declared void special assessments against the property of plaintiffs for street and sidewalk improvements. The trial court found certain irregularities in the as*3sessment proceedings and declared the entire assessment void. The irregularities complained of relate to allocation of costs and accounting procedures. Plaintiffs insist that the decree be affirmed. We think the first and decisive question is the standing of plaintiffs to seek judicial restraint of the assessment. To reach decision on that question it is necessary to first consider the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Fair Haven & Westville Railroad v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Hughes v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barns v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Assurance Co. of America v. MDF Framing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Assurance Co. of America v. MDF Framing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hoffarber v. GleasonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. MulvihillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.