Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Potlatch Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1990No. 18018PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This case requires us to determine the meaning of “manifestation” for purposes of the notice requirement of Idaho Code § 72-448.

Richard Boyd began working in Pot-latch’s lumber production facility in the fall of 1984. On October 31 of that year Boyd went to Dr. Mannschreck, an allergist and immunologist, complaining that his pre-existing asthma problems were becoming worse. Cedar dust at the Potlatch facility was one of the allergens Dr. Mannschreck suspected could be causing Boyd’s respiratory problems. On February 26, 1985, Dr. Mannschreck advised Boyd to seek employment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jackson v. General Refractories Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Florek v. Sparks Flying Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Olheiser v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sundquist v. Precision Steel & Gypsum, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Boyd v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ewing v. HoltonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lowery v. KuykendallIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API