Ewing v. Holton
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Justice.
This appeal arises from a decision by the Industrial Commission, denying Claimant Ewing’s worker’s compensation claim because she failed to meet the time requirements set forth in Idaho Code section 72-706(1). We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The following statement of facts is a summary of the stipulation of facts entered into by the parties.
Claimant Darlene Ewing worked for John H. Holton, D.M.D., as a dental hygienist from July of 1990 until October 24,1997. On October 27, 1997, Ewing sought treatment for “upper extremity complaints.” She was seen by nurse…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ogden v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Boise Orthopedic Clinic v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Bainbridge v. Boise Cascade Plywood MillIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Boyd v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990