Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Potlatch Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1990No. 18018Published

1Opinion of the Court

793 P.2d 192 (1990)

117 Idaho 960

Richard BOYD, Claimant-Respondent,

v.

POTLATCH CORPORATION, Employer, and

Workers' Compensation Exchange, Surety, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 18018.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 22, 1990.

Clements, Brown & McNichols, Lewiston, for defendants-appellants. Michael E. McNichols argued.

Goicoechea Law Office, Lewiston, for claimant-respondent. Richard G. Whitehead argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

This case requires us to determine the meaning of "manifestation" for purposes of the notice requirement of Idaho Code § 72-448.

Richard Boyd began working in Potlatch's lumber production…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jackson v. General Refractories Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Florek v. Sparks Flying Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API