Boyd v. Potlatch Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
793 P.2d 192 (1990)
117 Idaho 960
Richard BOYD, Claimant-Respondent,
v.
POTLATCH CORPORATION, Employer, and
Workers' Compensation Exchange, Surety, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 18018.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
May 22, 1990.
Clements, Brown & McNichols, Lewiston, for defendants-appellants. Michael E. McNichols argued.
Goicoechea Law Office, Lewiston, for claimant-respondent. Richard G. Whitehead argued.
BISTLINE, Justice.
This case requires us to determine the meaning of "manifestation" for purposes of the notice requirement of Idaho Code § 72-448.
Richard Boyd began working in Potlatch's lumber production…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Jackson v. General Refractories Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Florek v. Sparks Flying Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.