Legal Opinion
Godiksen v. Miller
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 21, 1986No. 3547PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding him liable on a note he executed in conjunction with the purchase of a parcel of land, and (2) in finding that the plaintiff seller was not liable to him for breach of contract, tortious interference with business relations and vexatious suit. Because the defendant did not present a record adequate to show otherwise, we find no error.
The plaintiff sold a parcel of land to Rena Builders, Inc., a company in which the defendant was a principal. In return, Rena gave the plaintiff a mortgage on the land and both Rena and the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- MacHiz v. Homer Harmon, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Urban v. LeggioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- First Constitution Bank v. Veldhuis, No. Cv89-0099107 (Mar. 15, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Opticare Centers v. Aaron, No. 0111491 (Feb. 24, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Rivera v. Baker, No. Cv91-0300593 (Jul. 29, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Teachers Insurance v. Broad Hanrahan, No. Cv93 0132304s (Jul. 22, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996