Opticare Centers v. Aaron, No. 0111491 (Feb. 24, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION "The motion to strike is the proper vehicle to challenge the legal sufficiency of any answer to any complaint, counterclaim or cross-claim, or any part of that answer including any special defense contained therein . . ." Practice Book 152. In passing on a motion to strike . . . we must take the facts alleged favorably to the pleader and view those facts in a broad fashion, not strictly limited to the allegations, but also including the facts necessarily implied by and fairly probable under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Meredith v. Police Commission of the Town of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Springfield-Dewitt Gardens, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Charles Holdings, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.